Injustices of the New GED

In January 2014, proposed changes to the GED test will affect many individuals seeking the high school equivalency diploma according to Diane Orson’s report for NPR.  For years the testing service that offered the GED was the nonprofit American Council on Education, but in 2011, the nonprofit stated that it would be “…merging with Pearson, a for-profit British company, and one of the largest educational testing companies in the world.” [Surprise, surprise.]

Needless to say, the price of the test is set to double from $60 to $120.  Some states choose to subsidize some or all of the test for its residents, however the exorbitant increase in cost may deter some governments to provide the financial assistance it previously was able to and will probably render many unable to afford any help at all in paying for the test.  This is antithetical to the nature of the test, which was designed to provide an opportunity for all individuals to obtain a diploma often necessary for more employment opportunities.  Low-income people will be further disadvantaged by the price of the test.

Additionally, the article states that the GED test itself “will be more rigorous and aligned with Common Core Standards” along with its complete digitization.  The computerization of the exam will add another element of division to the new test, a “digital divide” that privileges those who are comfortable with using a computer and taking online tests.  The article refers to some states that are seeking alternatives to the GED, but it doesn’t specify what these testing alternatives are.  I’d imagine and hope that as January 2014 approaches, the alternatives are effective, affordable, and available in all fifty states.

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to “Injustices of the New GED

  1. If proposed changes to GED test become a reality, people who take GED would find themselves in more disadvantaged situation from January 2014. The public education is free of charge, so GED should be too. The most disadvantaged, who for some reason cannot finished High School would be pay for Pearson company profit. The company which sees revenue should not be in charge for GED, because it make test lease affordable for low-income people.
    To make GED more rigorous is right decision. It should be equal to High School proficiency; otherwise it would be not equivalent to the High School Diploma. So, test should be adjusted each year to the Curriculum Framework of the school district. At the same time it should be held by government agency or by organization which make GED affordable or free of charge.
    If Pearson Company would become in charge of GED, the low-income people will be in more disadvantaged situation because the price of the test would rise. The equivalency of High School diploma provides more employment opportunities. Therefore, low-income people will be further deprived by the rising price of the test, and as a result job opportunities would move further away from them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s